i like caelum's process alot, but how are we going to do with bold voting? we'll need a submission of vote worthy suspects and then a topic to bold vote *however many suspects are summoned up to tribal council that month. how many mons are we gonna be banning per discussion? should we cap this?
i kind of agree with jabba as far as potential bogging the process down but i think overall caelum's timeframe is near idael since we have no idea what this new tier list even looks like and "no rhyperior come on" just doesn't seem like a rigorous starting point, despite it being pretty much a forgone conclusion. if people start spamming hippopotas/perior, then i guess smart people will just start spamming rain dance qwilfish/colo etc.
I'm presonally kind of excited for this and i think alot of people have "BL teams" waiting in the wings.
I think chaning terminology makes a ton of sense, but that's a big discussion in itself since honeslty "uber" is kind of a childish name in itself, and "overused" has a negative connotation even when it's our "ideal" tier.
brawl i find always had reasonable, if a bit sober, tier names. we could model it after that, something like
OverPowered[ pokemon], High Powered, Mid Powered [?], UnderPowered, Powerless for uber, ou , bl, uu and nu respectively
also credit to aa since i think i stole the idea for these names from aams forums way back when
just thinking out loud ~_~