Being so good that there's basically no reason not to use it is the definition of over centralizing. It DOES restrict team building in the sense that it has such incredible utility and versatility that almost any good team of any playstyle will find a use for it.Sigh. . . "Protected".
I'm getting tired of this "hurr durr, they want to protect stall/Landorus T/balance/Offense/whatever the fuck is hated by a fringe portion of the community at the time" nonsense.
There's nothing wrong with Landorus-T, no one is shielding their precious Pokemon from the big bad people that want it banned. It isn't broken, it isn't overcentralizing, and it has reliable checks/counters that don't restrict team building.
I get it, it's extremely prominent in the meta, why people think that is a bad thing is beyond me, but there's nothing wrong with it to warrant a ban or suspect, at least not yet.
Why is this a bad thing? Are you kidding? Landorus eliminates choice and diversity, creating a stagnant metagame that revolves around it. That's the WORST thing.
Just think about OU without Landorus for a second. Think how different it would be. That should give you an idea of the stranglehold this thing has on the meta.
Last edited: