Mega Alakazam and Aerodactyl are A- rank in the viability rankings, and the main reason they are not higher is the opportunity cost of not being able to use better megas. Even Mega Banette has a niche with Prankster Destiny Bond, but in OU there are better uses for your mega slot than a suicidal revenge killer. The only megas I can think of which truly suck in their own right are Mega Abomasnow and maybe Mega Glalie.Just saying...
Putting megas in a no mega latter defeats the point.
We wanted to see a meta with no megas. Even if you put in Mega Banette it defeats the point.
However, if they do decide to ignore the (No Megas) title and put in megas to see how it affects the mega less meta would be interesting.
But still, if you're putting in meh megas like Zam and Aero, they probably wont impact the meta that much as they dont really promote over centralization...
I'm interested in the idea.
OU already allows some megas and bans others, so while it would be interesting to allow weaker megas to shine without the better ones available, letting any mega back in basically amounts to this meta being OU using the UU suspect process to determine which megas are banned and which are not while standard OU is the same meta, but using the OU suspect process. If the point of this ladder is to test that process out, then we might as well cut the crap with the no mega title and ban Landorus, Keldeo, and any other close to being broken OU threat for this ladder and go from there.